Vicentesteb | Timberwolves

42 | an hour ago

Curry jumped like crazy, before 2015 he wasnt there at all but even before 2016 he was probably a top 50 player ever and then after 2016 he was top 20 for me. Didnt become a top 10 player until he solidified it in the 2022 playoffs, especially that finals.

Fishingfan4life

15 | an hour ago

As a warriors fan I think he really got overlooked in 2021 his stats were absurd and he should’ve won mvp in my opinion it was his best year even with no support. That 2022 was the cherry on top for me.

ShownMonk | LAL

3 | an hour ago

I’ve been a laker fan since shaq, and steph’s rivalry with LeBron reinvigorated my love of the game. I went from only watching laker games to watching like every playoff series. For me, what’s kept him from that echelon is boiled down to 2 things: his early injuries have made it to where his career totals are underwhelming, and people just don’t watch games anymore. People only look at stats.

SenecianGooner069

3 | an hour ago

Didnt become a top 10 player until he solidified it in the 2022 playoffs, especially that finals.

agreed, 2022 was insane.

i would go against numeric categories though as that depends more on other players and also there are just a lot of players and will be more players over time.

I would argue for categories like, “Mythical”, “Legendary”, “Heroic”, etc…

Mythical would probably players like Hakeem (foot work on a big), Bill Russel, Wilt Chamberlain (rule changes/nerfs), Lebron(player empowerment, longevity, player movement, winning/basketball strategy), Jordan (growing the game, pushing the skill boundaries of the game), etc.. Might even include curry (long distance shooting). just players doing insane things. truly game changing.

Legendary would probably be players like duncan, larry bird, Dirk Nowitzki, kobe, Chris Paul, Steve Nash, etc… Players that just had amazing careers. long careers. lots of winning.

Heroic would probably be players that are more local to one time for a shorter period of time and with less winning. maybe carmelo, john wall, derrick rose, etc… players who may have had an incredible peak but weren’t able to bring it all together, or were just unfortunately on poor teams.

the intention would be to be more narrative/historical based. more aligned with oral story telling. like what if basketball has been around for 2 thousand years. how would our ancestors categorize these different players.

UntilDoncic | Lakers

-2 | 41 minutes ago

I would argue he never became a top 10 player oat

Aromatic_Meal_6004

38 | 2 hours ago

He was top ten after the 2022 title

wanderlust5ever

21 | an hour ago

That team had no business of winning it all

PM_Me_FunnyNudes | Warriors

8 | an hour ago

It’s easily my favorite win of ours. 2015 has a bit of an asterisk due to Love & Kyrie getting injured, don’t think I need to say anything about the KD wins.

But 2022 was an all timer, hell our second best player was Andrew Wiggins (thought probably the best Wiggins has played in his career).

HOFredditor | Warriors

2 | an hour ago

say what ? That team was a historic defense until Dray got hurt. It was the epitome of defense wins championships.

Raonak | New Zealand

1 | 4 minutes ago

I mean historic defense only wins a finals when combined with a good offense.

You had negative spacers like Draymond, looney, GP2 playing in the same lineup. That doesn’t work without Steph Curry.

noahlylesusa | Clippers

21 | 2 hours ago

Top 75 after first ring

Top 50 after 2016 MVP season

Top 25 after 2 more rings

Top 10 (arguably) after 2022 FMVP

There’s not a case for him to be Top 5 or GOAT

ZhanMing057 | Celtics

17 | an hour ago

I don’t think you can put him top 3 but I think you can definitely argue for top 5 given how deep he has impacted the game. In terms of influence on how professional basketball is played, I don’t really think anyone else has a stronger claim than Steph other than players from the 60s and 70s.

He’s a methodological innovator first, and I think you can claim that he’s the methodological innovator as far as modern basketball goes. These days if you can’t shoot the 3 then you better be a athletic freak among freaks.

SeaGrocery678

16 | an hour ago

The influence to the game aspect is such a great point. I hope people consider it when ranking him even if it’s hard to quantify and compare like stats.

UntilDoncic | Lakers

2 | 37 minutes ago

Yeah but then you also need to weigh that with other game changing players like Shaq, Wilt, KAJ, Magic etc. they all had massive impacts and influence on the way the game was played

SeaGrocery678

1 | 27 minutes ago

I’d put curry up there with all them in terms of influence

noahlylesusa | Clippers

2 | an hour ago

I mean the argument is possible based off of impact but even then I feel like you have to stretch it a bit, just my opinion tho.

Fishingfan4life

0 | an hour ago

I think it depends on what you rate but off the court in terms of loyalty and his selflessness gives him a boost imo

bishopbeaniepower | Warriors

0 | an hour ago

It’s definitely a stretch and I also don’t think he’s top 5, but another argument for him in that tier is that he’s a must pick (in my opinion) for any “best starting 5 ever” type of thing.

UntilDoncic | Lakers

2 | 35 minutes ago

Is he really a must pick? I feel like my auto best starting 5 is

KAJ
Bron
Bird
MJ
Magic

bishopbeaniepower | Warriors

1 | 27 minutes ago

Magic vs. Steph for best PG ever is a real debate that I think there’s no right answer to, but I think Steph is way better than Magic for an all time starting 5. Mine is actually exactly the same as yours except with Steph instead of Magic, and here’s my reasoning. Magic is amazing on the ball (it’s his main argument over Steph for who’s better, and for good reason) but I’m not taking the ball out of Jordan and Bron’s hands for anybody. Magic loses a lot of value if he’s not orchestrating the offense, whereas Steph is actually more dangerous off the ball. He’s going to create such huge floor imbalances for MJ/Bron/Kareem to work in and prevent double teams. Obviously nobody should be too keen on leaving Magic Johnson open, but if the other option is letting one of the GOATs have free rein 1on1, they might help off of him somewhat beyond the arc. Do that with Steph and you’re beyond cooked. Curry is the ultimate force multiplier for other superstars and he’s gonna feast off of the attention the other guys draw.

SloshaPacana

-3 | an hour ago

Idk why people do this where they give credit to Curry for the 3 point revolution when it started before him

Houston and Morey started it, the Warriors when Curry won his first MVP they weren’t even the team with most attempts

I understand the logic that he made it more popular but he didn’t start it, just because someone is the best at it the league was moving towards it anyway with analytics

Curry was not an innovator of anything, he was the best at it, the analytics boom of the NBA started in 2013 with Morey and Houston

dvasquez93 | Warriors

3 | an hour ago

It’s because there’s different aspects to the 3pt revolution. Morey is responsible for starting the trend of teams as a whole shooting more 3 pointers, by the way he did it was generally by having a bunch more shooting role players than most teams so they’d open up space in the middle.

Curry was the first one to say “nah, I can build a superstar career off of 3s”.

The clearest way to see Curry’s impact is to check the leaders in 3PA each year. From 2012 and earlier, it was almost exclusively roleplayers dominating the top 5 each year. But from 2013 onwards, it flips to being almost exclusively star players.

Furthermore, Curry (and a bit later Harden) were the first ones to show how you could take the mid-range bag that guys like Kobe used, and translate those same moves to the 3 point line.

Effectively, he’s the reason teams started playing less like the Dwight-era Magic, with 4 roleplayer shooters opening up space for the main event, to playing like the Warriors, where star guards and forwards rely upon the 3 point line to be true threats from everywhere on the floor.

SloshaPacana

4 | an hour ago

Morey is responsible for both, it’s more analytics rather than Morey but Morey’s team was the first one to go full all in, it wasn’t just role players doing it for the Rockets, Harden was doing it off the dribble too then you had Ariza, Anderson and everyone there just chucking shit up before the Warriors even won

Obviously Curry had impact because when you see someone as good as him doing that off the dribble then people will copy, my entire point is the 3 point revolution was already on it’s way

And no it wasn’t just Curry btw, Lillard attempted 500+ threes as a rookie, Harden was already on nearly 500 despite having a mostly free throw baiting game, it was already happening

The game was already changing, pace was increasing, teams were going small, Heat in 2013 already started going small and shooting more threes

Shumonyu | Warriors

1 | 9 minutes ago

It’s not just about attempts it’s the kinds of threes Steph was taking, the distance, off-balance, in transition, pull-up threes. Though not to mention that he was already an outlier at the time in terms of makes and attempts. Yes on a team level, teams were already starting to take a lot of threes but what Steph was doing at the point in where the league was at the time, had zero comparison.

It was basically a basketball revolution happening in real time, basketball was probably already moving in that direction but Steph sped things up drastically. He had a dramatic effect on the kind of shot diet star players and perimeter players would have moving forward. His style of play also had a large effect on the standard defensive coverages moving forward and made the league move to the kinds of lineups and players that didn’t fold to pull up three point shooting. Frankly saying he’s not an innovator is just a ridiculous take.

Verminlord_Warpseer

2 | an hour ago

What you’re missing is that Houston style is moot with switching and help. Curry isn’t just an elite shooter, he’s elite off ball, look at literally every defender’s account of facing Curry. He’s the best at it yes and that told everyone else what is possible and they do it now (they don’t do morey houston). The warriors defense is what made it possible to prove too. Curry and the warriors are the innovators

ZhanMing057 | Celtics

1 | an hour ago

Because he proved that you can win with the strategy at the highest level.

A theory is just a theory, he’s (for the most part) the person who was able to empirically validate the theory.

SloshaPacana

-2 | an hour ago

Warriors didn’t prove the theory, they have never won while attempting the most threes

If you want a team to prove that live by the jumpshot die by it it’s the 2024 Celtics, other teams were not as jumpshot heavy

Warriors literally ran a version of the triangle, they were never as jumpshot heavy as people think, Kerr’s offense was always a mixture of it

SeaGrocery678

0 | an hour ago

The warriors and curry get credit for it because they won chips with it. It sucks it’s that way because the rockets were leading that charge originally. I think the record setting amount of 3s in a season strengthened the public perception in curry’s favor too.

SloshaPacana

4 | an hour ago

Winning doesn’t mean you get credit for a revolution that was already happening due to analytics and teams realizing 3 > 2, that is my argument

Obviously Curry would be the face of the 3 point boom, as would anyone that is so much better than everyone else at that skill that blows up

Curry is the greatest shooter ever but the analytics revolution had already begun by other teams, Warriors led the league in threes just twice in Curry’s entire career, it was 2016 and 2023, teams in 2012-13 had already started the three point revolution with small ball and the game was already changing

rocpilehardasfuk | Warriors

-1 | an hour ago

Before curry, an off the dribble 3 was reserved only for a handful. And before curry, deep 3s was a bad shot.

There’s a direct line between Steph and Wemby bombing away from 35 feet

thejontorrweno | Hawks

1 | an hour ago

Who is in your top 5 over him

noahlylesusa | Clippers

1 | an hour ago

MJ, Bron, Russell, Kareem, Magic, Bird, Duncan I think are all comfortably above him

Sea-Card-6586 | 76ers

5 | an hour ago

You can absolutely make an argument for Steph Curry over Bill Russell. People need to quit pretending playing in an 8 team league doesn’t matter.

babelove2 | Warriors Bandwagon

1 | an hour ago

I think you can argue him over magic and bird and duncan

SloshaPacana

-1 | an hour ago

No you cannot, Curry has 4 All NBA first teams

Magic has 9 in a way shorter career, Duncan has 11, Bird has 9

Curry lacks longevity to be in top 10, Curry missed a lot at the start of his career and missed two seasons with injury later on

babelove2 | Warriors Bandwagon

4 | an hour ago

lmao so what if he doesn’t have first team honors. he was a top 5 player from 2015-2023 and is still at top 20 player maybe higher. who the fuck cares about first team honors like that’s the only way to see if someone is good at basketball? like what?

SloshaPacana

-4 | an hour ago

First team All NBA shows you how dominant you are and how good of seasons you have vs the absolute best

4 All NBAs is pathetically low, every all time great has 5+ at least

babelove2 | Warriors Bandwagon

4 | an hour ago

he as more then 4 all nba teams he has 11… just not 4 first teams mostly cause he played with durant had some injuries and played against worse players with historic seasons. westbrook was not a better player ever then curry but got the nod over him. meanwhile magic was competing with kelvin johnson who no one fucking remembers

mike_dropp

1 | 40 minutes ago

All the arguments fall apart when you factor in that Steph is officiated completely different than any other player (much less superstar), past or present. The league refusing to call fouls to level the playing field because Steph is a living cheat code means we’ll never really know how great he could be in comparison, but if you watch the games instead of just looking at stats then Steph is 100% a top 5 player.

somebunnny | Warriors

4 | an hour ago

Curry lacks longevity but Bird and Magic don’t? Curry has played more games than either of them. You can absolutely argue Steph over both of them. You can also argue he comes up a little short of one or both of them. There’s no slam dunk there either way.

Sea-Card-6586 | 76ers

0 | an hour ago

Fuck longevity lmao that should only be a factor if a player had a very short peak. There is enough tape out over Currys 4 championships over 9+ years of elite play to be able to comfortably rank him amongst the greats.

SloshaPacana

-1 | an hour ago

There’s enough tape of each of those players doing too while having more accolades

Sea-Card-6586 | 76ers

4 | an hour ago

I don’t need to watch a guy not reach Currys peak a few extra years to know what I am looking at.

palelei | Timberwolves

-1 | an hour ago

wouldn’t also include wilt and shaq? these 9 names here + curry at #10 are in my top 10

Sea-Card-6586 | 76ers

0 | 41 minutes ago

What puts Shaq comfortably ahead of Curry? People pretend Currys peak wasn’t as dominant as Shaqs just because he didn’t slam dunk the basketball.

palelei | Timberwolves

1 | 10 minutes ago

their accomplishments are pretty similar but i think 2 more fmvp’s, all-defense selections, and actually winning in the finals at his peak is what puts shaq ahead of curry’s 1 extra mvp if we’re talking peaks

also i love 3’s as much as anyone else, klay thompson is my 3rd favorite player all time

Such_Ambassador2751

1 | an hour ago

2x mvp 1x champion easily made him top 25

Available_Object_665

13 | an hour ago

The 2016 MVP probably got him the top 75 and top 50 spots in one year.

Top 25 after 2017-18, maybe?

If you ARE someone who puts Steph in the top 10, it would be after his 4th ring in 2022

I don’t think Steph is top 5 or top 2 and don’t see the path for him as of now to get there.

Fun question though!

Educational-Group428

6 | an hour ago

If you are somebody who isn’t putting Steph in the top 10, I’m automatically going to assume you are trolling.

I’m talking generally I don’t think that you think this

K_a_n_d_o_r_u_u_s | Lakers

12 | 43 minutes ago

Problem with the top 10 is there are more than 10 players most people would agree are top 10 all time.

Is it trolling for someone to have (no particular order): MJ, Bron, KAJ, Magic, Bird, Wilt, Russell, Shaq, Duncan, Hakeem, and Kobe over Steph? Personally I’d put Steph 8th-9th on that list, but all these guys are the absolute legends of the game and arguing one over the other is just a matter of preference/criteria.

Available_Object_665

1 | 33 minutes ago

This is what I was gonna say. People love to throw around top 10 because it’s a nice number, but picking and choosing one of those studs to kick out is HARD man

BeloAve | Lakers

1 | 31 minutes ago

They are a lot of greats who deserve discussion in the top 10 and to just shoe in Steph is disingenuous at best.

Ok_Pineapple_Num | Warriors

1 | 7 minutes ago

No one is shooing in Steph lmao. In my opinion, the most fair view is that he’s in the #8-12 range along with Shaq, Kobe, Wilt, and Hakeem. All 5 of those guys are “top 10 worthy,” but you can only keep 3 of 5 in your top 10.

I personally keep Steph/Shaq/Kobe and exclude Wilt/Hakeem. But I think any reordering of those 5 is valid and defensible. Which is why I’d consider those 5 to all be “on the bubble top 10” guys.

Saying it’s “disingenuous” to put Steph in the top 10 is an overreaction though. I think what’s actually disingenuous is to say that any of those 5 guys is clearly top 10 or clearly not top 10.

UntilDoncic | Lakers

3 | 38 minutes ago

I mean I genuinely think he is in the top 10 conversation, and it’s absolutely fair to have him in it - but i think the top 12 is more appropriate. 8-12 are all close enough that I can see the case for any of them anywhere.

But he’s obviously below:

MJ
LeBron
KAJ
Magic
Russell
Duncan
Bird
Shaq

So that leaves

Kobe
Hakeem
Wilt
Curry

Ok_Pineapple_Num | Warriors

1 | 23 minutes ago

My tiers go:

Tier 1 (#1-3): MJ, Bron, Kareem

Tier 2 (#4-7): Magic, Bird, Russell, Duncan

Tier 3 (#8-12): Steph, Shaq, Kobe, Wilt, Hakeem

So you have to leave out 2 of the last 5. I personally think Steph’s the greatest out of those last 5… but I don’t think it’s crazy for someone to reorder any of the guys in the last tier. So I have him at #8, but I think it’s valid to put him anywhere from #8-12.

I’ll still fight anyone who says he’s not top 10 bc he’s my GOAT lmao. But if I’m being objective, it’s most accurate to say he’s right on the “top 10” bubble along with Shaq/Kobe/Wilt/Hakeem. The only 7 players that I think have an unequivocal spot in the top 10 are MJ/Bron/Kareem/Magic/Bird/Russell/Duncan.

informantfuzzydunlop | Spurs

2 | 35 minutes ago

I dislike top 10/25/50/etc rankings and prefer tiers like S/A/B/C/etc. Far more room for nuance when the non GOATs aren’t competing for like ⁵⁄₆ spots. But if I’m forced to do a top 10 he’s not in it. Hes in the top 15 for sure. But his defensive deficiencies compared to the other players who have an argument for top 10 keep him out.

Steph is A tier for me though as S tier is just the guys who are arguably the GOAT, were while they’re were playing, or were insanely dominant on both sides of the ball in their prime. So MJ Bron and Kareem for sure and I’d add Shaq since I watched him play in his prime. A tier is guys who were S tier on one side of the ball and at least B tier on the other and it’s guys who are A tier on both sides. Duncan was A tier on both side. Jokic and Steph are guys who are S tier on one side and at best B-ish tier on the other side.

songoku-166 [OP] | Knicks

2 | an hour ago

Yk, now I think about it, aren’t ppl already ranking SGA as a Top 25 player OAT with only 1 ring + 2 MVP’s?

Why wouldn’t have 2016 Curry been up there…?

Available_Object_665

1 | 40 minutes ago

The 2016 MVP season was INSANE, but the finals were really disappointing.

Player peaks are one thing, but careers matter more than people say they do. SGA certainly has a top 25 peak of all time, but he’s only led his team to the playoffs 3 times(2020 was CP3 led) and all 3 years his FG% has dropped MASSIVELY.

andreandroid | Spurs

10 | an hour ago

Top 50 - 73-9 + 2nd MVP
Top 10 (for me) - 4th ring

StrategyTop7612 | Clippers

8 | an hour ago

He was definitely higher than top 50 after having a top 5 season of all time

andreandroid | Spurs

1 | an hour ago

I agree, but I just went with the categories OP said it, and he wasn’t Top 25 for me

HOFredditor | Warriors

1 | an hour ago

Steph was def top 30 after his MVP.

andreandroid | Spurs

1 | 25 minutes ago

the first, I would disagree. the second is 100% arguable and probable, I just went with the categories OP did and I don’t know if I had him top 25 after that

EnJPqb | Warriors

4 | an hour ago

Top 75 - 2015 Top 25 - 2016 Top 10 - 2022

Nodecafallowed

1 | 32 minutes ago

Top 5 (and its not 1/2/3 or 4) - 2024 golden dagger

sauceEsauceE | Nuggets Bandwagon

5 | an hour ago

Top 75 and top 50 - 2016 season
Top 25 - 2018 season
Top 15 - 2022
Top 5 - never

Henesis

2 | an hour ago

In my opinion he’s top 5

Lebron And MJ are definitely over him.

Personally I’m a big supporter of bills 11 rings also but he’s also in contention to be below curry imo.

Everyone else he has a case to be near or around them.

shallowhelms

2 | an hour ago

Gonna be considered in the top 5 after retirement btw

Aebothius

0 | an hour ago

dude just did not answer the question

SeaGrocery678

-1 | an hour ago

As he should be

rocpilehardasfuk | Warriors

1 | an hour ago

All time rankings are deeply personal and I value helping your teammates massively. And creating space at the rim massively.

Steph is an easy top 10 all time for me over Wilt or Kobe or whoever.

Changed the game, made the rim the least guarded space on some nights

DamnYouAllIToldYouSo

1 | 40 minutes ago

Because Wilt didn’t change the game…

HotspurJr

2 | an hour ago

Nobody seriously thinks he’s the GOAT, as much as I would love to be able to say that.

I DO think there’s a reasonable conversation between him and Magic for best PG, if you understand the different eras, but Magic isn’t a top three all-timer anyway (and I also understand why many people would pick Magic.) The highest reasonable placement for Magic is 4 (after, in some order, Kareem, Jordan, and LeBron), and so that’s also the highest possible placement for Steph.

Anyway: top 50 (easily) after 2015. (People think he was bad in those playoffs/finals or that he was carried by the team. They’re wrong on both counts. The team won when Curry was good or great, and struggled when he was merely ok. He was good or great more than he was merely okay, and so then won the title.)

Top 25 after 2016. Also, not particularly close.

Top 10 after 2022.

I think top five is tough, but I do think it requires willful blinders to not have him top ten. (He’s the second-best player of the most competitive era of the NBA; the top ten is an exclusive club but if any era deserves two players in the top ten it’s this one. Most people excluding Curry will have three players from at least one weaker era).

TerrySaucer69 | Spurs

2 | an hour ago

Steph’s might be the most interesting of this.
His first ring put him in the top 75, like every other bus drivers first ring.
Without winning a championship, 2016 puts him top 25 or so.
Then two championships don’t really move him that much.
Then 2022 puts him solidly in the top 10.

Binkzzz | Warriors

1 | an hour ago

After the 2022 ring, I had curry at #11 all time. His 2024 Olympic performance pushed him comfortably to #10 all time.

palelei | Timberwolves

1 | an hour ago

2015 top 75
2016 top 25
2022 top 10

ArrowInBlack | Knicks

1 | an hour ago

2014: Unranked

2015: Top 75

2016: Top 25

2017: Top 20

2018: Top 15

2022: Top 10

3830BlockKing | Rockets

1 | an hour ago

Top 15 after 2022

CapMany9999

1 | 21 minutes ago

His 3rd ring put him in top 15 as he didn’t have a Final MvP.

Once he got his 4th and Final MvP he’s in the top 10.

Raonak | New Zealand

1 | 8 minutes ago

First ring: Top 75 UMVP season: top 25 Back to back rings: top 15 4th ring: top 10 Olympics: top 5 5th ring: top 3 Retirement: GOAT

Me personally: already the GOAT.

Sensitive_Entrance27

1 | 35 minutes ago

Hes not definitive top 10 yet for me but hes in the convo in tier 4

Tier 1: Goat debate - Any order Lebron MJ

Tier 2: Former Goat debate - KAJ 3rd and then any order for other 2

KAJ Magic Bird

Tier 3: Some shortfalls which stop them from being fringe Goat discussion/Tier 2 players - Any order

Kobe Shaq Duncan

Tier 4: Lack pure dominance, longevity, era strength to be in tier 3 - Any order

Wilt Hakeem Curry Russell West Oscar Robertson

Tier 5: Any order - Career legacy still building for most players here except for KD who wasnt good enough

Jokic Luka SGA Giannis KD Dr J

EatUrVitaminBROTHER | Timberwolves

-2 | an hour ago

I wouldn’t say he’s top 10 right now. He’s an elite shooter but other than that, a small guard who can’t defend, isn’t great at anything else really. Sorry but GOAT doesn’t stand for Greatest (shooter) of all time. You need to have a complete skill set. Everyone else in the GOAT discussion does.

Sensitive-Squash-429

-1 | an hour ago

Barely broke top 10 so anything beyond that is delusion

Mjhamp

-3 | an hour ago

Top 5 after 2022. Literally changed the game + tied up the consensus goat Bron in amount of rings. Steph being the one to stand in the way of bron and end up with the same amount of chips as him puts him in top 5 contention for me [yeah yeah get your “he had KD” for 2 of those comments out of the way idc, that team doesn’t work without Steph.]

prohired | GSW

-7 | 2 hours ago

Top 75 - 7.5 years ago, i.e. 2019 Top 50 - 5 years ago Top 25 - 2.5 years ago Top 10 - 1 years ago

And so on

songoku-166 [OP] | Knicks

1 | an hour ago

Iirc most people were saying he’s top 10 after his 2022 Finals performance. What makes you believe he only reached there last year?

msbest87 | Celtics

1 | an hour ago

What happened a year ago to move him up to Top 10?

leasthoodinthehood

1 | an hour ago

Not top 75 until 2019 is absolutely crazy. By 2018 he had already won back to back mvp’s, one of them being the first Unanimous MVP ever, and had won 3 championships. And you still wouldn’t consider him top 75 yet? Damian Lliard got put in the official top 75 ever half way through his career with no rings and no mvp’s.

When did Stephen Curry reach each milestone in the all-time rankings?