When the NBA created the max salary in 1998, in direct response to KG’s record 1997 contract, were the Wolves granted any cap relief? Because if not….
Some recent KG vs Duncan discussions prompted me to check out their respective contract histories.
KG’s second contract - the first one after getting out from underneath the rookie scale - was a record setting $126 million over six years. Famously, this deal kicked off the 1998 lockout and resulted in a very player-unfriendly CBA that included a new maximum salary.
Duncan signed his second contract under this new CBA in 2000. His terms? Three years, $32 million.
Wait, wut?
So the Spurs were paying Tim Duncan a little over half as much as the Wolves were paying KG? And this situation only happened because the league changed the rules *after* KG’s contract was signed?
Now I can’t find any definitive information regarding KG’s cap hold during this time, but it appears that the Wolves received no cap relief for contracts signed before the new CBA. So KG’s full salary counted against the cap.
How is that not insanely unfair? Wouldn’t that completely handicap the Wolves’ roster construction for the duration of KG’s contract?
The CBA also grandfathered in any pay scales established before it was signed, so KG’s next contract was still more expensive than the max. Not surprisingly, the first really good team KG ever had (in Boston) was only possible because he voluntarily took a paycut.
Long story short: doesn’t it seem like the NBA sabotaged KG’s prime in Minnesota? Was this unfair disadvantage the true catalyst for the illegal Joe Smith signing? Did the NBA actually crush the KG Wolves twice?