Is Tom Dundon bluffing? Where exactly would the Blazers go if he wanted to relocate?
Obviously it’s never a great thing when an owner is threatening relocation because he’s a tightwad who wants to extort taxpayers by taking advantage of their loyalty to a team. But the Blazers are in a very different position to the Sonics in 2008 or the Kings in 2013:
Clay Bennett bought the team with the intent to move it, and OKC was a large untapped market with no immediate territorial competition.
The Kings came very close to getting relocated, but Seattle is no longer available as a threat because the NBA has its eyes set on expansion and likely wouldn’t want Bennett fouling up the Sonics’ return with the bad PR of them returning via eliminating a geographic rival.
So that leaves a city without an NBA team, but all of the potential destinations have inadequate facilities (St. Louis), are too close to the market of another NBA team (Austin), or are just unattractive cities economically (Louisville). An out of the box choice like Mexico City would also make the League look bad, since Adam Silver probably doesn’t want the NBA’s first international expansion in over 30 years to come from uprooting another team. Dundon can’t use the Hurricanes’ arena because the Hornets would not allow their territory to be invaded. The list goes on.
I’m scratching my head trying to think of a single American city that the NBA would consent to have a team relocated to now that Seattle and Vegas are off the table, and I just can’t.