[Vorkunov] A former Aspiration executive said the Clippers wanted Aspiration to do the deal with Kawhi Leonard. The person explained: “I didn’t think of it so much as a quid pro quo but as a ‘you scratch my back, I scratch yours’”
Fascinating semantics debate going on here:
Despite the inactivity, Leonard and the Clippers were considered a vital part of Aspiration’s portfolio. The team and its star were priorities for the company, those people said, though their understanding of the reasons differ.
One person recalls Sanberg saying that the Leonard deal came with an understanding the team and the company would work on more deals together, and that the two were linked, though not as an explicit quid pro quo. The Clippers, this former executive said, wanted Aspiration to do the deal with Leonard.
“I didn’t think of it so much as a quid pro quo but as a ‘you scratch my back, I scratch yours,’” the person explained. “I know there’s a fine line but it doesn’t seem one was tied to the other.”
Another former executive disputed the notion that the Leonard deal was seen as a way to ensure more business with the Clippers. “Paying Kawhi was important,” they said, but so were the relationships with the franchise and Ballmer in general. The Clippers relationship was understood to be a high priority.