The Boston Celtics are 58-26 without Jayson Tatum over the last three seasons. Should they also consider trading him?
That is a .690 win percentage over the three year span.
Better than third place Cleveland (.667) and fourth place Denver (.654).
Other than Boston, the only team with a better win percentage is the Oklahoma City Thunder (.768).
If Boston can win without Tatum’s 5th highest average salary why don’t they trade him?