The Sacramento Kings (12-30) defeat the Washington Wizards (10-30), 128-115.

115 - 128

Box Scores: NBA - Yahoo

GAME SUMMARY

Location: Golden 1 Center

Officials: James Williams, Natalie Sago, and Jonathan Sterling

Team	Q1	Q2	Q3	Q4	Total
Washington Wizards	22	39	23	31	115
Sacramento Kings	41	26	34	27	128

TEAM STATS

Team	PTS	FG	FG%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	OREB	TREB	AST	PF	STL	TO	BLK
Washington Wizards	115	44-90	48.9%	11-34	32.4%	16-21	76.2%	7	38	23	22	9	11	2
Sacramento Kings	128	47-81	58.0%	15-31	48.4%	19-30	63.3%	12	58	36	19	5	18	5

PLAYER STATS


Washington Wizards	MIN	PTS	FGM-A	3PM-A	FTM-A	ORB	DRB	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	PF	±
Kyshawn George^SF	23:50	15	6-12	0-4	3-3	2	6	8	3	1	0	0	4	-12
Justin Champagnie^PF	26:43	15	7-11	1-3	0-0	2	5	7	2	0	0	0	4	-12
Alex Sarr^C	27:43	19	8-12	0-0	3-4	1	3	4	3	0	1	2	0	-5
Tre Johnson^SG	29:44	18	7-17	4-8	0-0	0	2	2	4	1	1	1	0	-1
Bub Carrington^PG	38:52	11	3-4	3-4	2-2	0	2	2	9	2	0	3	3	2
Will Riley	21:59	6	2-8	2-7	0-0	0	1	1	2	0	0	2	3	-18
AJ Johnson	11:28	4	2-6	0-2	0-0	1	2	3	0	1	0	1	1	-22
Marvin Bagley III	19:12	8	1-5	0-1	6-8	1	3	4	0	1	0	0	4	-8
Jamir Watkins	26:09	6	2-5	0-2	2-4	0	2	2	0	2	0	2	3	0
Malaki Branham	13:14	13	6-9	1-2	0-0	0	1	1	0	1	0	0	0	11
Anthony Gill	01:05	0	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Khris Middleton	00:00	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Sharife Cooper	00:00	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Bilal Coulibaly	00:00	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Tristan Vukcevic	00:00	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Cam Whitmore	00:00	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Trae Young	00:00	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Sacramento Kings	MIN	PTS	FGM-A	3PM-A	FTM-A	ORB	DRB	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	PF	±
DeMar DeRozan^SF	32:47	17	6-13	1-2	4-5	0	2	2	4	1	0	2	4	-7
Precious Achiuwa^PF	27:33	16	7-8	1-2	1-2	4	2	6	1	0	2	1	0	-2
Maxime Raynaud^C	21:40	4	2-5	0-0	0-2	2	6	8	5	1	0	1	1	-7
Zach LaVine^SG	32:22	16	6-12	3-6	1-2	0	2	2	3	1	2	0	3	10
Russell Westbrook^PG	31:03	26	9-14	6-9	2-2	1	1	2	6	1	0	4	2	0
Nique Clifford	18:53	9	3-6	2-4	1-2	2	5	7	3	0	0	1	1	19
Domantas Sabonis	21:14	13	5-6	0-1	3-5	0	6	6	5	1	1	4	2	14
Malik Monk	15:38	4	1-6	0-4	2-2	0	2	2	3	0	0	3	0	3
Dennis Schröder	20:10	15	4-6	2-3	5-8	0	1	1	5	0	0	1	1	12
Dylan Cardwell	18:40	8	4-5	0-0	0-0	3	6	9	1	0	0	1	5	23
Devin Carter	00:00	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Drew Eubanks	00:00	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Doug McDermott	00:00	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Dario Šarić	00:00	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Keon Ellis	00:00	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Keegan Murray	00:00	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Daeqwon Plowden	00:00	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Isaiah Stevens	00:00	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0

ajteitel | Suns

59 | 3 days ago

The Kings have added the Wizards to the royal list of frauds

PM_me_datSmile | Kings

45 | 3 days ago

Vivek for sure about to make another generationally dogshit move after seeing this 4 game win streak.

Welcome back to my Saboner

I love Dylan Cardwell.

DinoLaserFight | Kings

40 | 3 days ago

I just witnessed the battle of the 14th seeds

DidAnyoneElseJustCum | Cavaliers

14 | 3 days ago

That’s my favorite Wu Tang album

worquinnprogress | Kings

36 | 3 days ago

watch out nba… we might never lose again !! all hail the baby beamers !!

Ilikesporks_ | Lakers

32 | 3 days ago

sarr had 18 points on 8-10 shooting in the first half. if you’re the wizards coach surely you’d want to instruct your players to get him the ball more in the second half right? oh wait then the wizards might’ve actually started winning. anyway, he ended the game on 19 points on ⁸⁄₁₂ shooting lmao i don’t even think he shot the ball in the 4th quarter. benching tre johnson for will riley when it was still a single digit game just to bring him back in when the kings started widening the gap is also such a blatant tanking move

Barrelled_Chef_Curry | Warriors

3 | 3 days ago

Yeah so hard to enforce but this is the way teams really do it

violagoyf | Wizards

1 | 3 days ago

Not disagreeing in general but I believe Tre is still on a minutes restriction from his recent hip flexor injury.

Chessh2036 | Hawks

31 | 3 days ago

Wizards winning like 7 of 11 games, beating good teams, and then being like “alright that’s enough of this” so their FRP doesn’t go to the Knicks is hilarious. I get it though.

SenHeffy | Jazz

6 | 3 days ago

Game recognize game.

OddIndustry6073

20 | 3 days ago

I want Westbrook to get the Wade/Dirk all star appearance.

lani_brah

8 | 3 days ago

But he ain’t retiring yet😓

Spiritual-Bobcat5635

9 | 3 days ago

kings are a much more watchable product with sabonis back, but he better not ruin the tank :(

Desa-p | Kings

2 | 3 days ago

Strong disagree. I hate watching Sabonis play. Love Max and Cardwell though

Beleiverofhumanity | Clippers

7 | 3 days ago

If you dont love me at my Worstbrook, then you dont deserve me at my Bestbrook moment

gbooster | Pacers

3 | 3 days ago

Sabonis is so good. Glad to see him back. I can’t believe they might actually trade him.

darti_me | Mavericks

2 | 3 days ago

Can’t even call this the midoffs

DDBull | Spurs

1 | 3 days ago

Clash of the Titans

sasadoncic | Lakers

-22 | 3 days ago

The battle of bottom feeders…

CompetitiveReview416 | Lithuania

18 | 3 days ago

To which Lakers lost to…

sasadoncic | Lakers

-5 | 3 days ago

And? Did I say Lakers are contenders? But these two teams are bottom feeders. That’s a fact.

CompetitiveReview416 | Lithuania

6 | 3 days ago

It’s ironic to point that out when your team loses to bottom feeders. What then it makes the Lakers? Below the bottom feeders?

AmIFromA | Cabo Verde

3 | 3 days ago

If we want to use that metaphor - and we do want to use that metaphor - the Lakers are a a whale carcass.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whale_fall

CompetitiveReview416 | Lithuania

1 | 3 days ago

Nice

Lol

sasadoncic | Lakers

-4 | 3 days ago

No. OKC lost to bottom feeders too, if I’m not mistaken. What that makes them? Also, look at the overall record. You used the word irony, I think you don’t know what that is…

CompetitiveReview416 | Lithuania

1 | 3 days ago

Well, you’re not an OKC fan, so I don’t care. Better answer my question

sasadoncic | Lakers

0 | 3 days ago

What question? The stupid “but Lakers lost to them”? Seriously, you’re asking how a team can lose to a bad team in a 82 games’ season? Look up what teams beat the 72-10 Bulls, then come back to me. Please, try to make sense, son.

CompetitiveReview416 | Lithuania

1 | 3 days ago

Learn to read dude. How are Lakers called if they lose to bottom feeders? I already got an answer from another redditor, a whale carcass.

sasadoncic | Lakers

-1 | 3 days ago

I see English isn’t your native. So, I get the complete lack of comprehension.

Answering directly to your moronic question: a team.

And I thought that explaining to you how a few losses to bad teams do not define one would be enough. Oh, well. that’s on me, I guess.

CompetitiveReview416 | Lithuania

0 | 2 days ago

English isn’t my native, but you’re the one ignoring questions. Lol Maybe english isn’t your native too?

Scram with the elitism, you’re just digging a deeper hole for yourself.

Lakers are in deep shit recently, it’s not already a few losses. So you better watch your business, because the bottom feeders are feeding on your carcass.