Using Wemby’s aggressiveness against him?
I thought the Thunder did some things very slightly different last night that were very interesting.
First, always sending a 2nd cutter. Now this isn’t abnormal, but they also did it when it appeared the driver had a guaranteed layup. Of course, when Wemby swallowed that first opportunity up, the 2nd cutter was wide open and Wemby was out of position.
Second, using that 2nd cutter as a decoy. When the driver did not have a guaranteed path, it seemed like the 2nd cutter would get too close to the driver for good spacing. This seemed odd. But what happened is that it drew Wemby into position to play both the driver, the cutter, the pass, and probably even the corner 3 because he’s Wemby. In this scenario, which I saw quite a few times, there would actually be an open space to the basket, if the driver dared to try a layup against Wemby. However, in each case, the driver did a slight hesitation (to fake a pull up step back or pass), and then layed it up in an extremely quick motion before Wemby could react. Without the 2nd guy there (or if Wemby trusted his teammate to guard that guy), Wemby would be able to front the driver and there’s no chance at a layup.
Third, if all of this was closed out, the driver would simply bring the ball back out to the perimeter… with Wemby following him! This was a bit baffling, but it really seemed like Wemby wanted to choke every possible offensive opportunity. This would then leave the lane open for another cutter with an unprotected rim!
Now, all of this can easily be cleaned up by the Spurs with a few small tweaks, but it is going to require trust and communication between Wemby and the other Spurs defenders.