Based on a true story…
GGG: here are some runes
Same deal with spirit. I’m always 1-2 spirit short of whatever I’m trying to slot.
This is why sceptres are op , I have close to 400 spirit as a warrior 😂
Why not 4% per 50 INT? Or 2% per 25 INT? Simply can’t understand this
Fun detected - no can do
I personally enjoy breakpoints. Makes min maxing more satisfying
Because they want affixes like those to be an actual investment for a noticeable damage increase and not freebie pick ups just for existing. See the Curtain Call from PoE 1 as a big example.
I get the idea. But I mean, it is really that noticiable? If you invest lets say 250 INT (which is a bit more than the 205 required from gems), current damage increase is 16%, if it was 2% per 25 INT it would be 20%. Is it really problematic? I don’t even think so. It almost doesn’t change the ‘requires investment’ property of the notable, but makes it less frustrating to finish off just a tiny bit away from the next 100
I’ll just take your word that you “simply can’t understand this” because you just used a High INT example to support your argument of smaller INT intervals.
205 is the bare minimum for a lv20 gem lol, is this high for you? Ok then
Time to corrupt some jewels for attribute enchant
You will accidentally get like 300+ intelligence even you’re not stacking it on Caster character
is it scalable? per 100 does 150 int give 12%? so wouldnt 99 give 7.something%?
I’m 99.99% sure that is either you have 100 or you have 0.
No, you get 8% per 100 and nothing in between.
I’m a noob to the game, but what a bizarre effect. Are there really builds out there running 200-400 intelligence? If sub 200 is the only realistic amount, why would they make the effect like that?
There are builds that run with thousands of stats. If they wanted the effect to be more granular it would be 2% per 25 Int, or whatever value they wanted. You get what it says on the tin.
You can get 300+ on gear alone without astrimentus
Weirdest spelling of astramentis ive ever seen
My spelling is garbage so I trusted auto correct lol
Im running 450 int with not much effort really, lich with dmg on hex to help clear
i have 300 int kind of accidentally since im not rl trying to stack int just want it for the extra mana, so its def possible
with gear i would say 400 maybe even 500 isn’t that unrealistic
Level 20 int gems require 205 int. So at the bare minimum on casters you’re going to hit the 16% which is probably where it’s balanced around. 300 should be fairly easy if you don’t want to run hybrid gear or gems. And if you are actually stacking the stat you can hit 800? Maybe. I’ve seen some strength stackers with that much but there are more sources of % attributes/strength towards the bottom of the tree. So 600 int should be possible fairly easily if you commit to it.
You easily get to 300 for int without even getting increased int on tree
[deleted]
Wait is that how all stackers work? I thought it was flat breakpoints, in this case 90 int or 100 int and everything in between is rounded down…
I thought too. I’m not sure the first statement is accurate 🤔
I played a stat stacker monk last league. There are flat breakpoints, i.e. you don’t get any boost before 100 int with that node(?).
ye no, i can easily pull 500 int by level 60
Share your wisdom
% attribute nodes, gemling ascend, rares with int+all attributes, runes socketed into gear. Not sure why I’m being downvoted when Stat stacking is incredibly easy and scales well.
Let’s not forget gear with % attributes and the good Ole +5 per level
